All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Research Article

Mechanism of reversal of multidrug resistance by curcumin in human colorectal cancer cell line HCT-8/5-FU

Published: June 29, 2017
Genet.Mol.Res. 16(2): gmr16029414
DOI: 10.4238/gmr16029414

Abstract

Since there are no studies on the reversal of multidrug resistance by curcumin in the human colorectal cancer cell line HCT-8/5-FU, our aim was to search for highly efficient reversal agents and investigate the underlying mechanisms of this reversal. The cytotoxic effects of curcumin and 5-FU on HCT-8 and HCT-8/5-FU cells and the reversal effects of 5-FU in combination with curcumin on HCT-8/5-FU cells were measured using cell counting kit-8. Apoptosis and the cell cycle were analyzed by flow cytometry. Protein and mRNA expression levels of BCL-2, survivin, P-gp, and HSP-27 were detected by western blotting and quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, respectively. Curcumin inhibited the growth of HCT-8 and HCT-8/5-FU cells. It significantly reduced the IC50 of 5-FU for HCT-8/5-FU cells (P < 0.01) and the expression of BCL-2, survivin, P-gp, and HSP-27 in the cells. Curcumin can effectively reverse multidrug resistance in human colorectal cancer drug-resistant HCT-8/5-FU cells. The mechanism through which this occurs may be associated with decreased expression of BCL-2, survivin, P-gp, and HSP-27. Curcumin may therefore have clinical implications as a new agent for colorectal cancer.

Introduction

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignancies of the digestive system. It is a highly malignant cancer with rapid disease progression and is, therefore, a serious threat to human health (Lu et al., 2013). Current clinical therapies for colorectal cancer include surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and treatment with Chinese medicine, of which chemotherapy is often the only option if the cancer has progressed beyond the possibility of successful treatment with surgery and radiotherapy (Li and Li, 2015). However, the efficacies of various chemotherapy regimens appear to have reached their “plateau”, partly due to the development of multidrug resistance (MDR) by colorectal cancer cells (Chang et al., 2006). MDR in tumor cells is a phenomenon in which cells that are resistant to one anti-cancer drug acquire resistance for other anti-cancer drugs having different chemical structures and different targets (Ahmad et al., 2015). MDR is a normal phenomenon under physiological conditions since there are no intended targets or specific reactions when a drug enters normal organs, tissues, or cells. Under pathological conditions, however, interaction between a drug and drug-resistant cells may lead to the loss of sensitivity to multiple drugs, resulting in treatment failure. Research on MDR-reversal agents is therefore the key to overcoming the failure of chemotherapy.

There are obvious advantages and great developmental potential in the application of traditional Chinese medicine for MDR reversal. It is imperative to actively search for new single reversal agents in Chinese medicine to enhance treatment efficacy and to improve patients’ quality of life. Curcumin is widely found in rhizomes of Zingiberaceae plants, such as Curcuma longa, C. zedoaria, and C. wenyujin. In previous studies, curcumin has demonstrated broad pharmacological activities, including anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative, and anti-tumor effects (Guzzarlamudi et al., 2016). In addition, it has been found that curcumin can reverse drug resistance in tumor cells from gastric, hepatic, and cervical cancers as well as other malignancies (Colacino et al., 2016; Muddineti et al., 2016). The mechanism by which this reversal occurs remains unclear. In this study, the activity of curcumin was investigated in drug-sensitive and drug-resistant human colorectal cancer cell lines to assess effects on reversal of drug-resistance and to understand the underlying mechanisms.

Materials and Methods

Materials

Human colorectal cancer cell lines HCT-8 (drug-sensitive) and HCT-8/5-FU (drug-resistant), as well as newborn calf serum, were purchased from Zhejiang Tianhang Biotechnology Co. Ltd. (Huzhou, China). Trypsin, RPMI-1640 complete medium, and 0.25% trypsin solution were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). Curcumin and 5-FU standards were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) was purchased from Bestbio Biotechnologies (Shanghai, China).

Cell culture

HCT-8 and HCT-8/5-FU cells were cultured in a humidified incubator at 37°C with 5% CO2 in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% newborn calf serum, 160 IU/L insulin, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin. Trypsin digestion with 0.25% trypsin solution was used for cell passaging.

Growth curves of HCT-8 and HCT-8/5-FU human colorectal cancer cell lines

Single-cell suspensions at 5 x 104 cells/mL HCT-8 and HCT-8/5-FU log-phase cells grown in RPMI-1640 medium were prepared. The cells were then seeded in 96-well plates (100 μL/well, 5 x 103 cells/well) and cultured for 1 to 7 days in replicates of 6. CCK-8 kit was used to measure OD450. Time-dependent growth curves were plotted on the X-axis and OD on the Y-axis.

CCK-8 detection of the cytotoxic effects of curcumin on HCT-8 and drug-resistant HCT-8/5-FU cells

Single cell suspensions of HCT-8 and HCT-8/5-FU cells in log-phase growth were prepared in RPMI-1640 medium. Each well of a 96-well plate was seeded with 100 μL/well (104 cells/mL) of the suspension, and the plate was incubated for 24 h at 37°C with 5% CO2 to allow cell adhesion. Curcumin (100 μL of 0, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, and 25 μg/mL curcumin concentrations) was added to the drug-sensitive and drug-resistant cultured cells, and the plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 h. The culture medium was then aspirated and pre-made CCK-8 solution was added. The plates were incubated for 2 h at 37°C after which OD450 was measured using a microplate reader. The rate of inhibition was calculated, and the concentration of curcumin vs the rate of inhibition was plotted. Inhibition rate (%) = (1 - experimental well A value / blank control well A value) x 100. The IC50 and non-cytotoxic IC10 of curcumin were calculated.

CCK-8 detection of the cytotoxic effects of 5-FU on HCT-8 and drug-resistant HCT-8/5-FU cells

HCT-8 and HCT-8/5-FU cells in log-phase growth were prepared in single-cell suspensions in RPMI-1640 medium and seeded into 96-well plates (100 μL/well at 104 cells/mL), and the plates were then incubated for 24 h at 37°C with 5% CO2 to allow cell adhesion. Cells were then treated with various concentrations of 5-FU at 37°C for 48 h. Drug-sensitive cells were treated with 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 3.2, 6.4, or 12.8 μg/mL 5-FU; drug-resistant cells were treated with 0, 30, 60, 90, 150, 300, 600, or 1000 μg/mL 5-FU. After 48 h, the culture medium was aspirated and CCK-8 solution was added. The plates were incubated for 2 h at 37°C. OD450 values were measured using a microplate reader and IC50 values were calculated. The resistance ratio was calculated as follows: resistance ratio = IC50 (HCT-8/5-Fu) / IC50 (HCT-8).

CCK-8 detection of the cytotoxic effects and reversal ratio of combined 5-FU/curcumin on drug-resistant HCT-8/5-FU cells

Single-cell suspensions of HCT-8/5-FU cells in log-phase growth were prepared in RPMI-1640 medium and incubated in 96-well plates (100 μL/well at 104 cells/mL) for 24 h at 37°C with 5% CO2 to allow cell adhesion. Different concentrations of 5-FU (100 μL of 0, 30, 60, 90, 150, 300, 600, and 1000 μg/mL) were then added, followed by the addition of different concentrations of curcumin (0, X1, and X2 μg/mL). After shaking gently, the plates were incubated for 48 h at 37°C with 5% CO2 before the CCK-8 detection. Each treatment was performed in replicates of 6. As determined in previous experiments, X1 and X2 were curcumin concentrations that inhibit <10% growth of HCT-8/5-FU cells (IC10). The IC50 of combined curcumin/5-FU on HCT-8/5-FU cells was calculated, and the reversal ratio = IC50 (HCT-8/5-Fu) / IC50 (HCT-8 / Fu + curcumin).

Synergistic effect of combined curcumin/5-FU on drug-sensitive and drug-resistant HCT-8 cells

Single-cell suspensions of HCT-8 and HCT-8/5-FU cells in log-phase growth were prepared in RPMI-1640 medium and incubated on 96-well plates (100 μL/well at 103 cells/mL) for 24 h at 37°C with 5% CO2 to allow cell adhesion. Cells were then treated with different concentrations of 5-FU and curcumin (100 μL). Drug-sensitive HCT-8 cells were treated with 0.47 μg/mL 5-FU and 4.00, 7.00, and 10.50 μg/mL curcumin, respectively. Similarly, drug-resistant HCT-8/5-FU cells were treated with 96.40 μg/mL 5-FU and 4.16, 8.44, and 12.96 μg/mL curcumin, respectively. Untreated controls were maintained for both drug-sensitive and drug-resistant cells, and each treatment for the two cell types had 6 replicates. After the cells were cultured for 48 h at 37°C, the culture medium was aspirated and pre-made CCK-8 solution was added to each well. The plates were then incubated for 2 h at 37°C. OD450 values for each well were measured using a microplate reader and the rate of inhibition of each treatment was calculated. The synergistic effect was calculated using the following formula: q = E(AB) / [EA + (1 − EA) x EB], where E(AB) is the rate of inhibition of combined curcumin/5-FU, EA is the rate of inhibition of curcumin, and EB is the rate of inhibition of 5-FU. A value of q < 0.85 indicates that the two drugs are counteractive; when q = 0.85-1.15, the effect of the two drugs have an additive effect, and when q > 1.15, the two drugs have a synergistic effect. The greater the q value, the greater the synergistic effect.

Effect of combined curcumin/5-FU on cell cycle and apoptosis of drug-resistant HCT-8/5-FU cells

HCT-8/5-FU cells in log-phase growth were grown to 80% confluency and then treated with different concentrations of curcumin and 5-FU. Cells were cultured for 48 h at 37°C with 5% CO2, and cell cycle and apoptosis were analyzed by flow cytometry. Data were analyzed by using the CellQuest software.

Quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis of the effects of combined curcumin/5-FU on BCL-2, survivin, P-gp, and HSP-27 mRNA levels in drug-resistant HCT-8/5-FU cells

HCT-8 and HCT-8/5-FU cells in the log-phase of growth were grown to 80% confluency and treated with different concentrations of curcumin and 5-FU. Cells were cultured for 48 h at 37°C with 5% CO2, followed by qRT-PCR analysis. SYBR green dye was used to detect target gene expression, and GAPDH was used as the reference gene. Each reaction mixture contained 10 μL PCR mix, 0.4 μL primer F, 0.4 μL primer R, 1.0 μL cDNA, and 8.2 μL ddH2O, with a total volume of 20 μL. PCR conditions were as follows: 50°C for 2 min, 95°C for 2 min pre-denaturation, 95°C for 15 s, 60°C for 60 s for 40 amplification cycles. The relative expression of the target gene was calculated using the formula: 2-ΔΔCt = relative expression of target gene, ΔCt = Ct(target gene) - Ct(GAPDH), △△Ct = ΔCt(experimental sample) - ΔCt(control sample) (Table 1).

Primer Sequence Product size (bp)
BCL-2-F GATAACGGAGGCTGGGATGC 150
BCL-2-R TCACTTGTGGCCCAGATAGG
survivin-F(BIRC5) GGACCACCGCATCTCTACAT 149
survivin-R(BIRC5) CCAGCTCCTTGAAGCAGAAGAA
P-gp-F(ABCB1) CGTGGGGCAAGTCAGTTCAT 139
P-gp-R(ABCB1) TCCTTCCAATGTGTTCGGCA
HSP-27-F(HSPB1) GGAGATCACCGGCAAGCAC 115
HSP-27-R(HSPB1) GGAGGAGGAAACTTGGGTGG
GAPDH-F TGTTGCCATCAATGACCCCTT 202
GAPDH-R CTCCACGACGTACTCAGCG

Table 1: Primer sequences.

Western blot analysis of the effects of combined curcumin/5-FU on BCL-2, survivin, P-gp, and HSP-27 levels in drug-resistant HCT-8/5-FU cells

HCT-8/5-FU cells in log-phase growth were grown to 80% confluency and treated with different concentrations of curcumin and 5-FU. After culturing for 48 h at 37°C with 5% CO2, the culture medium was aspirated followed by washing of the cells thrice with phosphate-buffered saline. Cell lysis buffer was added to the pellets and mixed with a pipette to ensure complete cell disruption. Total protein from cells that received each treatment was extracted and 5X sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis loading buffer was added to the extracted protein, followed by heat denaturation. After cooling, samples were centrifuged (8000 r/min) for 5 min, and the supernatants were collected. Proteins present in samples were separated by gel electrophoresis, which ran for 70 min, followed by transferring of the gel onto a membrane at 100 V. Membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat milk for 1 h, and then incubated overnight with primary antibody at 4°C. Incubation with secondary antibody was conducted for 1 h at 25°C, followed by thorough washing of the membranes. Developer solutions A and B were mixed, and 1 mL mixture was added onto the membrane. ChemiScope Mini chemiluminescence imaging system was used to detect and photograph the target protein bands. β-Actin was used as the control.

Statistical analysis

SPSS 19.0 software was used to analyze the data. Multivariate comparison was performed using ANOVA. Equal group variances were analyzed by the least significant difference method and unequal group variances by the Dunnett’s T3 method. The experimental data were expressed as means ± standard error. Statistical significance was achieved when P < 0.05. Graphical data representation was generated by GraphPad Prism 5.0.

Results

Cytotoxic effects of curcumin and 5-FU on HCT-8 and HCT-8/5-FU cells

To test the cytotoxic effects of curcumin and 5-FU on HCT-8 and HCT-8/5-FU cells, the following analysis was undertaken. The IC50 of curcumin on HCT-8 and HCT-8/5-FU cells was 10.384 μg/mL and 12.962 μg/mL, respectively (Figure 1A). The IC10 of curcumin on HCT-8 and HCT-8/5-FU cells was 4.201 μg/mL and 5.241 μg/mL, respectively. The IC50 of 5-FU on HCT-8 and HCT-8/5-FU cells was 4.467 μg/mL and 331.095 μg/mL, respectively, with a drug resistance ratio of 74.12 fold (Figures 1B and C). When 4 μg/mL curcumin was added to various concentrations of 5-FU, the IC50 of this combined curcumin/5-FU was 179.257 μg/mL, representing a 1.85-fold reversal. When curcumin was present at 5.5 μg/mL, the IC50 of combined curcumin/5-FU was 89.246 μg/mL, with a 3.71-fold reversal. Since 4.0 μg/mL and 5.5 μg/mL curcumin result in a rate of inhibition of <10% in HCT-8/5-FU cells, and the reversal ratio of 5.5 μg/mL curcumin was higher than that of 4.0 μg/mL curcumin, 5.5 μg/mL curcumin was used in subsequent experiments (Figure 1D).

geneticsmr-Mechanism-reversal-Cytotoxicity-curcumin

Figure 1: Cytotoxicity of curcumin and 5-FU on HCT-8 and HCT-8/5-FU cells. A. Inhibition curves of curcumin on HCT-8 and HCT-8/5-FU cells. B. Inhibition curves of 5-FU on HCT-8 cells. C. Inhibition curves of 5-FU on HCT-8/5-FU cells. D. Inhibition curves of curcumin + 5-FU or 5-FU on HCT-8/5-FU cells.

Effect of combined curcumin/5-FU on cell cycle and apoptosis of HCT-8 and HCT-8/5-FU cells

To test effect of combined curcumin/5-FU on cell cycle and apoptosis of HCT-8 and HCT-8/5-FU cells, the following analysis was undertaken. When HCT-8 cells were treated with curcumin, 5-FU, or combined curcumin/5-FU, there was significant increase in the proportion of cells in the G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle, accompanied by a significant decrease in the proportion of cells in the S + G2/M cell cycle phase. Cells were arrested at the G0/G1 phase and apoptosis was induced. The number of G0/G1 cells that received combined curcumin/5-FU was significantly higher than those that received either curcumin or 5-FU (P < 0.05), suggesting that the combined use of curcumin and 5-FU induced HCT-8 cell apoptosis to a greater extent than that by 5-FU or curcumin alone (Table 2, Figure 2).

geneticsmr-Mechanism-reversal-different-treatments

Figure 2: Effect of different treatments on HCT-8 and HCT-8/5-FU cell cycles.

Cell Treatment G0/G1 (%) S (%) G2/M (%)
HCT-8 Untreated 36.87 ± 1.29 31.33 ± 0.51 31.80 ± 1.74
5-FU 61.37 ± 0.90Δ# 21.73 ± 4.27 16.90 ± 4.68
Curcumin 56.10 ± 0.60Δ# 25.97 ± 0.87Δ 17.93 ± 0.32Δ
5-FU + Curcumin 71.77 ± 1.52Δ 15.17 ± 4.50 13.07 ± 3.00Δ
HCT-8/5-FU Untreated 36.53 ± 1.07 33.70 ± 2.88 29.77 ± 1.86
5-FU 61.76 ± 0.06Δ 17.27 ± 1.63Δ 20.97 ± 1.57Δ
Curcumin 61.40 ± 1.31Δ 19.43 ± 3.25Δ 19.17 ± 2.57
5-FU + Curcumin 73.93 ± 0.93Δ 12.63 ± 0.90Δ 13.43 ± 0.32Δ

Table 2: Effect of different treatments on HCT-8 and HCT-8/5-FU cell cycles (means ± s, N = 12).

HCT-8/5-FU cells treated with combined curcumin/5-FU increased in proportion in G0/G1 phase with a significant decrease in the number of S-phase cells. The cell cycle was arrested at G0/G1 phase and apoptosis was induced. The number of G0/G1 cells in the combined curcumin/5-FU group was significantly higher than that in the curcumin or 5-FU groups (P < 0.05), suggesting that the combined use of curcumin and 5-FU induces greater HCT-8/5-FU cell apoptosis than the use of either 5-FU or curcumin alone (Table 2, Figure 2).

When HCT-8 or HCT-8/5-FU cells were treated with curcumin, 5-FU, or combined curcumin/5-FU, apoptosis in all the treated groups of cells was significantly elevated compared to that in the untreated cells (P < 0.05). In addition, apoptosis in the combined curcumin/5-Fu group was significantly higher than that in the curcumin-alone or 5-FU-alone groups (P < 0.05) (Table 3, Figure 3).

geneticsmr-Mechanism-reversal-cell-apoptosis

Figure 3: Effect of different treatments on HCT-8 and HCT-8/5-FU cell apoptosis.

Treatment group HCT-8 apoptosis (%) HCT-8/5-FU apoptosis (%)
Untreated 2.90 ± 0.56 3.50 ± 1.22
5-FU 18.50 ± 0.82Δ# 18.40 ± 1.61Δ#
Curcumin 36.63 ± 2.10Δ# 41.80 ± 2.72Δ#
5-FU + Curcumin 65.80 ± 0.89Δ 79.60 ± 3.96Δ

Table 3: Effect of different treatments on HCT-8 and HCT-8/5-FU cell apoptosis (means ± s, N = 12).

BCL-2, survivin, P-gp, and HSP-27 mRNA expression after treatments

To test the effect of combined curcumin/5-FU on cell cycle and apoptosis of HCT-8 and HCT-8/5-FU cells, the qRT-PCR method was used. Levels of BCL-2, survivin, P-gp, and HSP-27 mRNA are markedly different in HCT-8 or HCT-8/5-FU cells treated with curcumin, 5-FU, or combined curcumin/5-FU than those observed in untreated cells (P < 0.05). Furthermore, combined curcumin/5-FU treatment resulted in significantly lower levels of mRNA for these markers compared to those observed in the curcumin- or 5-FU-treated cells (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the expression levels of these genes between cells treated with curcumin alone or 5-FU-alone (P > 0.05) (Table 4).

Cell Treatment BCL2 Survivin P-gp HSP-27
HCT-8 Untreated 1.002 ± 0.079 1.003 ± 0.092 1.003 ± 0.102 1.014 ± 0.204
5-FU 0.454 ± 0.065Δ 0.428 ± 0.032Δ 0.326 ± 0.056Δ 0.405 ± 0.054Δ
Curcumin 0.453 ± 0.099Δ 0.494 ± 0.045Δ 0.343 ± 0.038Δ 0.334 ± 0.127Δ
5-FU+ Curcumin 0.315 ± 0.062Δ 0.387 ± 0.067Δ 0.189 ± 0.043Δ▲ 0.264 ± 0.024Δ
HCT-8/5-FU Untreated 1.012 ± 0.191 1.013 ± 0.199 1.004 ± 0.105 1.003 ± 0.094
5-FU 0.323 ± 0.062Δ* 0.374 ± 0.067Δ* 0.478 ± 0.074Δ#* 0.566 ± 0.100Δ#*
Curcumin 0.394 ± 0.067Δ 0.387 ± 0.041Δ 0.406 ± 0.066Δ# 0.463 ± 0.100Δ#
5-FU+ Curcumin 0.235 ± 0.035Δ 0.297 ± 0.016Δ 0.275 ± 0.018Δ 0.281 ± 0.094Δ

Table 4: Relative quantitation of mRNA levels in HCT-8 and HCT-8/5-FU cells after different treatments (means ± s, N = 12).

Western blot analysis of BCL-2, survivin, P-gp, and HSP-27 levels after the treatments

Early qRT-PCR analysis determined that mRNA levels of BCL-2, survivin, P-gp, and HSP-27 were not significantly different between cells treated with curcumin and those treated with 5-FU. Therefore, subsequent western blot analyses did not include cells treated only with 5-FU.

To test levels of BCL-2, survivin, P-gp, and HSP-27 in cells treated with combined HCT-8/5-FU, the western blot method were used. Protein levels were quantified by density analysis of HCT-8/5-FU cells that received the different treatments. The results indicated that untreated HCT-8/5-FU cells had relatively high levels of BCL-2, survivin, P-gp, and HSP-27. Drug treatment reduced the protein levels by various degrees. In the 5-FU + curcumin cells, levels of BCL-2, survivin, P-gp, and HSP-27 were significantly different than those in the untreated control cells (P < 0.05). Curcumin-only treatment resulted in significant changes in BCL-2, P-gp, and HSP-27 levels (P < 0.05), but not in survivin levels, when compared to those in the untreated cells. Of all the measured proteins, only the expression of HSP-27 was significantly different between the 5-FU + curcumin and curcumin-only treated cells (P < 0.05) (Table 5 and Figure 4).

geneticsmr-Mechanism-reversal-curcumin-treated-cells

Figure 4: Differences in levels of BCL-2, survivin, P-gp, and HSP-27 in HCT-8/5-FU cells that received the different treatments. Note From left to right: bands 1, 2, and 3 are from untreated control cells; bands 4, 5, and 6 are from curcumin-treated cells; bands 7, 8, and 9 are from 5-FU + curcumin-treated cells.

Treatment BCL-2 Survivin P-gp HSP-27
Untreated 0.709 ± 0.054 0.588 ± 0.052 0.560 ± 0.027 0.652 ± 0.082
Curcumin 0.442 ± 0.013Δ 0.434 ± 0.012 0.391 ± 0.043Δ 0.408 ± 0.191Δ
5-FU + Curcumin 0.457 ± 0.037Δ 0.399 ± 0.139Δ 0.275 ± 0.104Δ 0.088 ± 0.025Δ▲

Table 5: Relative quantitation of protein expression in HCT-8/5-FU cells after different treatments (means ± s, N = 9).

Discussion

Chemotherapy is one of the critical strategies used in the treatment of cancer. However, its clinical efficacy is often far from satisfactory because of the property of MDR in tumor cells. The mechanism of MDR is very complex and involves many factors and the following pathways: 1) high expression of proteins that confer drug-resistance, such as MRP and P-gp; 2) abnormal activity of drug metabolism-related enzymes, including glutathione transferase and DNA topoisomerase; 3) aberrations in the apoptosis pathway; 4) and the presence of hypoxia and a low-glucose microenvironment. Understanding the mechanism of multidrug resistance in colorectal cancer and improving therapeutic efficacy are issues that require immediate attention. Many resistance-reversing drugs such as cyclosporin A, verapamil, quinidine, trifluoperazine, and tamoxifen have limited clinical applications because of their high toxicity or low activity. It is, therefore, extremely important to search for and identify reversal agents with high efficacy and low toxicity. Recent studies have shown that curcumin can reduce MDR by regulating the expression of genes involved in drug resistance and apoptosis in cancer cells (Negi et al., 2014; Baldwin et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2016a).

BCL-2 belongs to a family of well-studied anti-apoptosis genes that encode membrane-bound proteins involved in cell survival. BCL-2 inhibits the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), regulate intracellular Ca2+ concentrations, modulate transmembrane transportation, bind to signal transduction proteins, and regulate signaling pathways, all of which are associated with the development of MDR (El-Khattouti et al., 2013; Hoshyar et al., 2013; Cerezo et al., 2015).

Survivin is another anti-apoptosis gene that promotes cell proliferation and inhibits apoptosis. Although expressed at low levels in normal adult thymus and testis, survivin is highly upregulated in solid malignant tumors. There are a number of molecular mechanisms by which survivin inhibits apoptosis. Firstly, it has the ability to inhibit caspases directly, predominantly caspase-3 and caspase-7, to block apoptosis. Survivin can also inhibit caspases indirectly through p21 by interacting with cyclin-dependent kinase CDK-4 to form a survivin-CDK4 complex, which then releases p21 from the complex. p21, in turn, binds to the mitochondrial caspase 3 to inhibit caspase activity and prevent apoptosis. Secondly, survivin can also inhibit the NF-κb signaling pathway to indirectly achieve an anti-apoptotic effect (Wu et al., 2015; Gao et al., 2016). Furthermore, clinical studies have revealed that survivin levels are closely associated with the onset, progression, and prognosis of gastric cancer (Han et al., 2015; Pandey et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2016b; Yang et al., 2016). In the present study, high levels of BCL-2 and survivin were found in untreated HCT-8/5-FU cells. Curcumin or combined curcumin/5-FU treatment resulted in a marked and statistically significant decrease in BCL-2 and survivin levels. The decrease in BCL-2 and survivin levels was consistent with the curcumin-induced apoptosis seen in our earlier experiments. Reduction in BCL-2 levels resulting in upregulation of Bax and Caspase-3, elevation of the Bax/BCL-2 ratio, and increased activation of Caspase-3 may be one possible underlying mechanism for apoptosis. In addition, reduced survivin levels could also lead to decreased inhibition of Caspase-3, thereby promoting apoptosis.

P-gp is a transmembrane glycoprotein, encoded by the multidrug resistance gene, and functions as an energy-dependent efflux pump in drug-resistant cells. P-gp levels are associated with cell membrane permeability, intracellular drug concentration, and drug binding capacity. P-gp may play a role in the reversal of drug resistance by promoting apoptosis-inhibiting protein expression and inhibiting enzyme activity (Chhikara et al., 2015; Han et al., 2005). In the present study, the elevated P-gp expression detected in untreated HCT-8/5-FU control cells was consistent with that observed in a typical drug-resistant cell line. Curcumin and 5FU + curcumin interventions resulted in a significant decrease in P-gp expression, and its ability to reverse drug resistance may be achieved through the upregulation of ATP-dependent Topo-II.

HSP-27 is a small protein, belonging to the HSP family in human cells, and a relatively newly identified regulator of 5-FU resistance in colorectal cancer (Schweiger et al., 2015). Its functions include protecting cells from stress-induced damage and acting as a chaperone in the maintenance of intracellular protein activity. HSP-27 plays a role in the regulation of cell proliferation and differentiation, as well as apoptosis signal transduction (Ghosh et al., 2013). Increased HSP-27 expression could reduce the ability of chemotherapy to destroy tumor cells, suggesting that HSP-27 can influence the resistance to chemotherapy (Hsu et al., 2011; Hayashi et al., 2012; Zhao et al., 2012). The importance of HSP-27 in drug resistance has been further demonstrated in studies where inhibition of HSP-27 expression by siRNA increased the sensitivity of cancer cell lines to chemotherapeutic drugs (Lelj-Garolla et al., 2015). In the present study, HSP-27 expression in curcumin- or curcumin/5-FU-treated cells was significantly lower than that in untreated control cells. This finding suggested that curcumin was able to reverse drug resistance via inhibition of HSP-27 expression and enhancement of sensitivity to chemotherapeutic drugs. The underlying mechanism for this reversal may be associated with HSP-27-induced AKT phosphorylation in the NF-κB pathway, which in turn inhibits p21 nuclear translocation.

Recent studies on the reversal of multidrug resistance by curcumin have focused on gastric, liver, and cervical cancers. There have also been a few on the reversal of multidrug resistance by curcumin in colorectal cancer cell lines. However, to our best knowledge, no study on the reversal of multidrug resistance has focused on the colorectal cancer cell line HCT-8/5-FU. In the present study, we have examined the resistance-reversal effect of curcumin on the drug-resistant human colorectal cancer cell line HCT-8/5-FU. We observed that curcumin treatment resulted in significantly decreased levels of expression of BCL-2, survivin, P-gp, and HSP-27 compared to those in untreated control cells, demonstrating the ability of curcumin to reverse drug resistance in the human colorectal cancer cell line HCT-8/5-FU. This reversal could be due to the reduction in P-gp and HSP-27 expression levels, thereby reducing drug efflux from tumor cells and increasing intracellular drug concentrations. In addition, down-regulated expression of BCL-2 and survivin could inhibit tumor cell proliferation and enhance apoptosis. Curcumin may therefore have clinical implications as a new therapeutic agent for colorectal cancer. Since the resistance-reversal property of curcumin was examined only on the HCT-8/5-FU cell line, we will assess this property of curcumin using other human colorectal cancer cell lines in the future.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

Research supported by grant (#Y-L2014-002) from the CSCO-Lizon Cancer research
foundation of traditional Chinese medicine.

About the Authors

Corresponding Author

H.L. Zhang

Second Oncology Department, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China

Email:
huwenting725@163.com

References

  • Ahmad N, Khan AH, Syed Sulaiman SA and Javaid A (2015). Fluoroquinolones resistance in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Pakistan and suitability of guidelines recommended standardized regimen. Int. J. Mycobacteriol. 4: 258-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmyco.2015.05.012
  • Baldwin PR, Reeves AZ, Powell KR, Napier RJ, et al. (2015). Monocarbonyl analogs of curcumin inhibit growth of antibiotic sensitive and resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 92: 693-699. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.01.020
  • Cerezo D, Cánovas M, García-Peñarrubia P and Martín-Orozco E (2015). Collateral sensitivity to cold stress and differential BCL-2 family expression in new daunomycin-resistant lymphoblastoid cell lines. Exp. Cell Res. 331: 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.11.017
  • Chang HY, Pan KL, Ma FC, Jiao XY, et al. (2006). The study on reversing mechanism of multidrug resistance of K562/ A02 cell line by curcumin and erythromycin. Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 27: 254-258.
  • Chhikara S, Sazawal S, Mishra P, Chaubey R, et al. (2015). C1236T polymorphism in MDR1 gene correlates with therapeutic response to imatinib mesylate in Indian patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia. Natl. Med. J. India 28: 272-275.
  • Colacino JA, McDermott SP, Sartor MA, Wicha MS, et al. (2016). Transcriptomic profiling of curcumin-treated human breast stem cells identifies a role for stearoyl-coa desaturase in breast cancer prevention. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 158: 29-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-3854-4
  • El-Khattouti A, Selimovic D, Haikel Y and Hassan M (2013). Crosstalk between apoptosis and autophagy: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic strategies in cancer. J. Cell Death 6: 37-55.
  • Gao DQ, Qian S and Ju T (2016). Anticancer activity of Honokiol against lymphoid malignant cells via activation of ROS-JNK and attenuation of Nrf2 and NF-κB. J. BUON 21: 673-679.
  • Ghosh A, Lai C, McDonald S, Suraweera N, et al. (2013). HSP27 expression in primary colorectal cancers is dependent on mutation of KRAS and PI3K/AKT activation status and is independent of TP53. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 94: 103-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexmp.2012.09.001
  • Guzzarlamudi S, Singh PK, Pawar VK, Singh Y, et al. (2016). Synergistic chemotherapeutic activity of curcumin bearing methoxypolyethylene glycol-g-linoleic acid based micelles on breast cancer cells. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 16: 4180-4190. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2016.11699
  • Han G, Gong H, Wang Y, Guo S, et al. (2015). AMPK/mTOR-mediated inhibition of survivin partly contributes to metformin-induced apoptosis in human gastric cancer cell. Cancer Biol. Ther. 16: 77-87. https://doi.org/10.4161/15 384047.2014.987021
  • Han Y, Bu LM, Ji X, Liu CY, et al. (2005). Modulation of multidrug resistance by andrographolid in a HCT-8/5-FU multidrug-resistant colorectal cancer cell line. Chin. J. Dig. Dis. 6: 82-86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1443-9573.2005.00197.x
  • Hayashi N, Peacock JW, Beraldi E, Zoubeidi A, et al. (2012). Hsp27 silencing coordinately inhibits proliferation and promotes Fas-induced apoptosis by regulating the PEA-15 molecular switch. Cell Death Differ. 19: 990-1002. https:// doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2011.184
  • Hoshyar R, Bathaie SZ and Sadeghizadeh M (2013). Crocin triggers the apoptosis through increasing the Bax/Bcl-2 ratio and caspase activation in human gastric adenocarcinoma, AGS, cells. DNA Cell Biol. 32: 50-57. https://doi. org/10.1089/dna.2012.1866
  • Hsu HS , Lin JH, Huang WC, Hsu TW, et al. (2011). Chemoresistance of lung cancer stemlike cells depends on activation of Hsp27. Cancer 117: 1516-1528. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.25599
  • Lelj-Garolla B, Kumano M, Beraldi E, Nappi L, et al. (2015). Hsp27 inhibition with OGX-427 sensitizes non-small cell lung cancer cells to erlotinib and chemotherapy. Mol. Cancer Ther. 14: 1107-1116. https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-0866
  • Li H and Li L (2015). Relationship of GSTP1 lower expression and multidrug resistance reversing of curcumin on human colon carcinoma cells. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 95: 2478-2482.
  • Lu WD, Qin Y, Yang C, Li L, et al. (2013). Effect of curcumin on human colon cancer multidrug resistance in vitro and in vivo. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 68: 694-701. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2013(05)18
  • Muddineti OS, Kumari P, Ajjarapu S, Lakhani PM, et al. (2016). Xanthan gum stabilized PEGylated gold nanoparticles for improved delivery of curcumin in cancer. Nanotechnology 27: 325101. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/27/32/325101
  • Negi N, Prakash P, Gupta ML and Mohapatra TM (2014). Possible role of curcumin as an efflux pump inhibitor in multi drug resistant clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 8: DC04-DC07.
  • Pandey A, Vishnoi K, Mahata S, Tripathi SC, et al. (2015). Berberine and curcumin target survivin and STAT3 in gastric cancer cells and synergize actions of standard chemotherapeutic 5-fluorouracil. Nutr. Cancer 67: 1293-1304. https:// doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2015.1085581
  • Schweiger T, Nikolowsky C, Starlinger P, Traxler D, et al. (2015). Stromal expression of heat-shock protein 27 is associated with worse clinical outcome in patients with colorectal cancer lung metastases. PLoS One 10: e0120724. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120724
  • Wang J, Wang F, Li F, Zhang W, et al. (2016a). A multifunctional poly(curcumin) nanomedicine for dual-modal targeted delivery, intracellular responsive release, dual-drug treatment and imaging of multidrug resistant cancer cells. J. Mater. Chem. B Mater. Biol. Med. 4: 2954-2962.https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TB02450A
  • Wang TA, Zhang XD, Guo XY, Xian SL, et al. (2016b). 3-bromopyruvate and sodium citrate target glycolysis, suppress survivin, and induce mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis in gastric cancer cells and inhibit gastric orthotopic transplantation tumor growth. Oncol. Rep. 35: 1287-1296.
  • Wu M, Chen J, Wang Y, Hu J, et al. (2015). URGCP/URG4 promotes apoptotic resistance in bladder cancer cells by activating NF-κB signaling. Oncotarget 6: 30887-30901.
  • Yang B, Huang J, Liu H, Guo W, et al. (2016). miR-335 directly, while miR-34a indirectly modulate survivin expression and regulate growth, apoptosis, and invasion of gastric cancer cells. Tumour Biol. 37: 1771-1779. https://doi. org/10.1007/s13277-015-3951-8
  • Zhao M, Shen F, Yin YX, Yang YY, et al. (2012). Increased expression of heat shock protein 27 correlates with peritoneal metastasis in epithelial ovarian cancer. Reprod. Sci. 19: 748-753. https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719111432875

Keywords:
Download:
Full PDF