All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Research Article

Identification and phylogentic analysis of sheep pox during an outbreak of sheep in Sharkia Governorate, Egypt

Received: February 14, 2018
Accepted: March 30, 2018
Published: April 06, 2018
Genet.Mol.Res. 17(2): gmr16039901
DOI: 10.4238/gmr16039901

Abstract

Sheeppox virus (SPPV) is one of the listed and notifiable disease affect sheep production with major effect on the trade of new breed of sheep. This study was conducted to identify sheep pox by using cell culture, electron microscope (EM) and open reading frame (ORF) 103 gene during an outbreak of local breed of sheep occurred in Sharkia Governorate, Egypt in April 2017. Affected adult sheep showed typical skin pox lesion on face, the inner side of lips, inner aspect of the thigh and under the tail. The incidence rate of infection was 23.5% and the mortality rate in young lambs aged 3 to 6 months old was 8.2%. Forty-three scabs and tissue samples from clinically diseased adult sheep and dead lambs were collected and subjected to culture on Vero cell. The cytopathic effect (CPE) was observed within 3 to 7 days in 40 samples. A typical Poxvirus was a brick-like shape with round ends by negative staining of EM and ovoid like structure with dumb-bell shaped DNA core with concave bodies sides by positive staining of EM. By conventional PCR utilizing ORF103 gene and obtained bands of about 570 bp referred to SPPV. The sequence amplicon was analyzed by NCBI-BLAST and register in GeneBank under accession N. MG873537 and phylogentic tree was designed which revealed that the isolated strain of SPPV was resembled with other strains of SPPV isolated in Egypt, India, China, and USA. Finally, both EM and PCR are considered as sensitives, rapids, and powerful methods to identify SPPV from tissue and scab’s samples without the need of further culture in addition to the useful and easily use of ORF103 gene to differentiate SPPV from other Capripoxvirus.

Introduction

Sheep is considered one of the most important economic sources due to its high-quality meat and wool production. Sheep are raised either by small-scale farmers or in village flocks managed by shepherds.  Sheep pox disease is considered as one of an economically important disease in sheep producing area all over the world. Sheep pox disease is caused by Sheeppox virus (SPPV), DNA virus, recorded as one of the largest viruses (170-260 nm by 300- 450 nm), belonged to genus Capripoxvirus; (CaPVs), subfamily; Chrodopoxvirinae, family Poxviridae (Matthews, 1982; Kitching and Taylor, 1985). The other members of the genus are Goatpox virus (GTPV) and Lumpy skin disease virus (LSDV) of cattle (Murphy et al., 1995). Sheeppox virus (SPPV) and Goatpox virus (GTPV) were antigenically and genetically closely related to each other (Fenner et al., 1996). The current criterion used for classifying CaPVs. The genus was based on animal species from which the viruses were isolated, SPPV from sheep, GTPV from goats and LSDV from cattle (Babiuk et al., 2009).

Sheep pox disease is endemic in the Middle East, including Egypt, Iran, Afghanistan, North Africa, Turkey, Iraq and the Indian subcontinent. In South-Eastern Europe, sporadic outbreaks occur (OIE, 2017). SPPV is one of the 15 animal pathogens listed by Animal World Health Organization (OIE) and 23 by (Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency USDA) which can be used as an animal biological warfare agent (USDA, 2002). 

SPPV is a highly contagious disease, spread through aerosols and/or close contact with infected animals, indirect means such as contamination of cuts and abrasions (Kitching and Carn, 2004). Poor conditioned animals, overcrowding, poor feeding, general mismanagement, and abnormal uses of vaccination considered the main causes for distribution of sheep pox disease (Sheikh-Ali et al., 2004; Zangana and Abdullah, 2013). SPPV characterized by fever, appearance of pox lesions as papular, pustular, scab stages on areas devoid of wool such as checks, lips, nostrils, inner aspect of the thigh and under the tail in which the skin lesions usually heal within 5-6 weeks (Davies and Otema, 1981).

Laboratory confirmation of Poxvirus infection by electron microscopy (EM) based on the visualization and morphological identification of virus particles in diseased tissue samples. EM is considered as one of the methods used for differential diagnosis of skin lesions induced by other viruses (Curry et al., 2006 and Yadav et al., 2010). Negative staining of EM had the advantages of easily sample preparation, rapid diagnosis (same day result) and the undirected (open view) of EM allowed rapid morphological identification and differential diagnosis of agents which present in the isolate supernatant (Hazelton and Gelderblom, 2003). Positive staining of EM detects the inner structure of SPPV which helps in confirm diagnosis of disease. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is considered a rapid, sensitive and good specific technique on detection and differentiation of SPPV based on the open reading frame (ORF) 103 genes from other similar diseases affecting sheep. ORF103 gene was used for genotyping and phylogenetic analysis of SPPV (Zhu et al., 2013). The disease agent was confirmed as SSPV by clinical signs, post-mortem examination, detection and identification of isolated Poxvirus by isolation of the causing agent, using electron microscope (Negative and Positive staining) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique

Material and Methods

Outbreak of the disease

A natural outbreak of typically clinically diseased non-vaccinated flock of sheep with SPPV was recorded in Kafr Shalshamoun, Menya Al Qamh, Sharkia, Egypt in April 2017. Eighty-five local sheep flock with history of non-vaccination for 7 years which consisted from 56 adult sheep and 29 lambs in which the incidence of the infection was 23.5% (20 infected) and 8.2% mortality rate of young infected lambs aged between the 3-6 month of age. The owner was quickly separate clinically infected lambs from non-infected ones. Thirty skin samples of crusted scabs lesions were collected from 20 affected adult sheep in addition to 13 postmortem lesions were collected from dead lambs; the collected samples were stored at -70ºC until further examination.

Clinical examination of sheep

Sheep were clinically observed for the manifestation of general clinical signs related to skin lesions as papules, nodules and scab’s formation on an area free from wool and hair that lead to suspect infection with pox disease in addition to post-mortem examination of dead lambs (Constable et al., 2017).

Preparation of suspected tissue samples

According to (OIE,2017) 10% suspension of suspect tissue samples (papules and scabs) prepared in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) containing antibiotic [penicillin (100 U/ml), streptomycin (100 μg/ml), neomycin (2.5mg/ml) and nystatin (50 U/ml)]. The samples were ground with sterile sand in a mortar. The homogenized suspension was frozen–thawed three times and then partially clarified by centrifugation at 5000 rpmfor 10 minutes to remove tissue depress and then stored at -70ºC till used.

Isolation of virus from suspected tissue samples on cell culture

Viral antigens grown in Vero cell culture African green monkey kidney cell line (Vero) was used for inoculation of the tissue sample in trials for isolation and propagation of virus. It was supplied from Egyptian organization for Biological Products and Vaccines, Agouza, EL- Giza, procedure was performed according to (OIE, 2017). A 200 µl of clarified tissue preparation supernatant is inoculated to a 25 cm2 Vero cell-culture flask of 90% confluent cell, and supernatant is allowed to absorb for 1 hour at 37°C after washing with warm PBS and 10 ml of a suitable medium, such as 199E media, containing antibiotics and 2% fetal calf serum was added. The culture is examined daily for 7–14 days for appearance of cytopathic effect (CPE).

Infected cells developed a characteristic CPE consisting of retraction of the cell membrane from surrounding cells, and eventually rounding of cells and margination of the nuclear chromatin. At first only small areas of CPE can be seen within 4 days after infection then the following 4–6 days the growth expands to involve the whole cell sheet. If no CPE is apparent by day 7, the culture should be exposed to freeze–thaw three times and clear supernatant inoculated again into fresh tissue culture with further incubation for 4 to 7 days but if still negative, third passage is done but if the negative result is recorded again, the sample is considered negative.

Detection and identification of the virus by EM

A-Negative staining

The 10 skin tissue samples (papules and scabs) were ground in a sterile mortar with a small volume of distilled water and centrifuged for 15 min at 5000 rpm. The supernatant was collected and centrifuged again for 45 min at 13000 rpm, then the pellet was rinsed with distilled water, then a droplet of 1% phosphotungstic acid mixed with a droplet of tissue suspension on a copper grid coated with carbon formvar, The grid was drained using filter paper, air dried, washed by Paraformaldehyde buffered with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) after drying when the sample is too thick on the grid then grid dried again before examined under EM. The electron beams penetrate the virion but surface structures visible by the contrast of the embracing electron-dense tungsten that appeared black (Ohi et al., 2004).

B-Positive staining

The detection of virus in suspected tissue samples (5 scabs and tissue samples) using positive staining technique of electron microscope according to (Kay, 1965): The samples were cut into small pieces and then embedded in glutaraldehyde 5% for 24 hours with further washing and embedded and finally the samples embedded inside molds with resin in order to be in the plastic caps, the embedded tissue samples were ready to be cut into thin and ultra-thin sections by ultra-microtone apparatus. Ultra-thin sections of the samples stained with heavy metals (uranyl acetate and lead citrate) for preparing sections to be inspected by an electron microscope.

Extraction of DNA

The QIAamp DNA Mini Kit provides silica-membrane-based nucleic acid purification is used for purification of DNA from scabs and tissue samples according to manufacture instructions and the resulted DNA used as PCR template for amplification.

Amplification of PCR product

Sheep pox open reading frame 103 gene (ORF 103) was designed as published data of Zhu et al. (2013) and obtained from Metabion (Germany) as the following (Forward primer, 5´ ATGTCTGATAAAAAATTATCTCG 3´) and (Reverse primer, 3´ ATCCATACCATCGTCGATAG 5´). The PCR was carried in 25 µl total mixture volume as illustrated in Table 1.

Component Volume/Reaction
Emerald Amp GT PCR master mix (2x premix) 12.5 μl
PCR grade water 4.5 μl
Forward primer (20 pmol) 1 μl
Reverse primer (20 pmol) 1 μl
Template DNA 6 μl
Total 25 μl

Table 1: Preparation of PCR master mix according to Emerald Amp GT PCR master mix (Takara)

Cycling conditions of the primers during PCR

Temperature and time conditions of the two primers during PCR are shown in the table (2) according to Zhu et al. (2013).

Gene Primary denaturation   Final extension
Secondary denaturation Annealing Extension No. of cycles
Sheep pox ORF 103 94˚C
5 min.
94˚C
30 sec.
52˚C
45 sec.
72˚C
45 sec.
35 72˚C
10 min.

Table 2: Cycling conditions of the ORF 103 primers during PCR

Agarose gel electrophoreses (Sambrook et al., 1989) with modification

Mix 10 μl of each PCR product samples, negative control and a positive control with loading dye solution and load in 1.5% agarose gel in TAE (Tris/ Acetate/ EDTA) buffer containing ethidium bromide Load a parallel lane with a 50 bp DNA-marker ladder. Separate the products at 100 volts for 30–40 minutes and visualize using a UV Transilluminator. The gel was photographed by a gel documentation system and the data was analyzed through computer software and confirm the positive reactions according to the size (Sambrook et al., 1989).

Sequencing and phylogenetic analysis

570 bp PCR band was exposed to sequence in an automated ABI DNA sequencer (Germany) and the obtained sequence was exposed to analysis using NCBI-BAST and compared with other Capripoxvirus sequences available in GeneBank as shown in table 3. The phylogenetic tree was obtained by the using of neighbor-joining method using MEGA program version 6.0 software.

Virus Strain Country Accession number
Sheeppox virus SPPVE1 Menya Al Qamh ORF103 gene* Egypt MG873537
Sheeppox virus El-Minufiya ORF 103 gene Egypt MF443334
Sheeppox virus SPPV/57-2823/Pune/2007 India KX398522
Sheeppox virus SPPV/32-01/Jalandhar/2011 India KX398521
Sheeppox virus SPPPV/30-02/Ahmedabad/2008 India KX398520
Sheeppox virus SPPV/3174/Pune/2007 India KX398518
Sheeppox virus SPPV/Pune/2008/P4 India KX398505
Sheeppox virus SPPV/Srinagar/2000/P5 India KX398503
Sheeppox virus SPPV/30-01/Ahmedabad/2008 India KX398519
Sheeppox virus SPPV/Jaipur/P3 India KX398516
Sheeppox virus SPPV/Roumanian Fanar/P37 India KX398500
Sheeppox virus SPPV/Makdhoom/2007/P6 India KX398504
Goatpox virus GTPV 143/Mukteswar/2012 India KX398510
Goatpox virus GTPV/Sambalpur/2001/P6 India KX398512
Goatpox virus GTPV/Uttarkashi/1978/P101 India KX398499
Goatpox virus GTPV/Akola/2008/P4 India KX398506

Table 3: Poxvirus strains used to phylogentic analysis

GeneBank accession number

The obtained ORF103 gene sequence was aligned by CLUSTAL W version 1.81 software then submitted to GeneBank database under the accession number (MG873537) with the name of SPPVE1 Menya Al Qamh ORF103 gene.

Results

A natural outbreak of typically clinically diseased non-vaccinated flock of sheep with SPPV was recorded in Kafr Shalshamoun, Menya Al Qamh, Sharkia, Egypt in April 2017. The local flock of sheep (85) was consisted from 56 adult sheep and 29 lambs with history of non-vaccination for 7 years, in which the incidence of the infection was 23.5% (20 infected from 56 adult sheep) and 8.2% mortality of young infected lambs of age range between 3 to 6 months. The clinical examination of the diseased sheep revealed that rise of body temperature (range between 40ºC to 40.8ºC), decrease food intake, nasal discharge and skin lesions vary from redness to papules and nodules moreover, ulcer formation and scabs in different sites include all face, inside lips, eyes, nostrils, innerside of the thigh and under the tails as illustrated in Figure 1. Postmortem examination of dead lambs revealed the presence of oedema, papules, nodules and less observed the formation of an ulcer on tongue, trachea and lung in addition to congestion of abomasal mucosa.

Identification-phylogentic-Photographs-sheep

Figure 1: Photographs of sheep with typical skin lesions of sheep pox virus: A1: Scattered nodules in all face of sheep, B1 & C1: Typical nodules of pox lesion on inner side of lips, D1, E1 &1: Formes of sheep pox disease under the tail (small erthematus papules, nodules, and scab formation).

Thirty skin samples of crusted scabs lesions were collected from 20 affected adult sheep in addition to 13 postmortem lesions were collected from dead lambs. Forty-three homogenated samples were subjected to isolation of SPPV by inoculation 200 µl of 10% suspension on Vero cell culture, the inoculated cells were examined microscopically daily for detection the development of cytopathic effect (CPE). The positive samples showed the characteristic granulation of cells followed by cell rounding and aggregated separtely; this occurred after 3 days post inoculation and gradually increased till 70-80% of the sheet that was completely detached in some samples after 5-7 days (Figure 2 B&C). The control Vero cell culture and the 3 negative cells were characterized by roughly or slightly spindle shape cell in monolayer confluent sheet (Figure 2 A). Forty samples were success to culture and showed CPE on Vero cell but only 3 samples were failed to develop on cell culture.

Identification-phylogentic-Vero-cell-culture

Figure 2: Vero cell-culture (Mag. 40x): A2: Control culture, B2: CPE of pox virus on Vero cell as a retraction of cell membrane, C2: CPE of pox virus on Vero cell as cell rounding and aggregated together.

Negative staining of EM used to visualize SPPV morphology in 10 original papules and scab suspensions. SPPV virion in examined samples revealed that electron micrograph of a typical Poxvirus was brick-like shape with round ends as shown in Figure 3.

Identification-phylogentic-brick-like-round

Figure 3: Virion of SPV by negative staining of EM (brick-like round end virion) (Mag. 30000x).

Positive staining of EM used to visualize the inner structure of SPPV in 5 scabs and tissue samples were revealed that electron micrograph of a typical SPPV was ovoid like structure with dumb-bell shaped DNA core with concave bodies side as illustrated in Figure 4.

Identification-phylogentic-positive-staining

Figure 4: Ovoid-like structure with dumb-bell shaped DNA core with concave side bodies of virion of SPV (positive staining of EM).

Based on ORF 103 gene, 10 infected tissues and scabs were used to detect of sheep pox virus by PCR technique. Amplicon of expected size (570 bp) was observed on agar gel electrophoresis as seen in Figure. 5. Amplification of specific DNA of SPPV was evident in all the samples. One of amplified amplicon was cut, purified and sequenced. The obtained sequence was aligned by CLUSTAL W 1.81 and admitted to GeneBank under the accession number MG873537.

Identification-phylogentic-positive-SPV-amplicons

Figure 5: Conventional PCR by ORF 103 gene showing SPV (amplicon of about 570 bp): M: DNA ladder of 600bp, Lane 1: positive control, Lane 2: negative control, Lane (3,4,5,6,7,8): positive SPV amplicons.

ORF103 sequenced gene was analyzed using NCBI-BLAST. The result of NCBI-BLAST analysis revealed that the strain of SPPV obtained was related to other Capripoxvirus worldwide distributed with percentage of identity range from 100% with other strains of SPPV include (Sheeppox virus isolate SPPV-GL, complete genome amd Sheeppox virus NISKHI, complete genome …etc) to 99% with other example of Sheeppox virus as (Sheeppox virus isolate SPPV/Roumanian Fanar/P37 virion core protein gene, complete cds)  to 97% with other GTPV as (Goatpox virus isolate GTPV/Sambalpur/2001/P6 virion core protein gene, complete cds  and Goatpox virus isolate GTPV 143/Mukteswar/2012 virion core protein gene, complete cds)  and with LSDV as (Lumpy skin disease virus isolate SERBIA/Bujanovac/2016, complete genome and  Lumpy skin disease virus isolate Evros/GR/15, complete genome).

Phylogentic tree was designed by the using of MEGA version 6.0 program as shown in Figure. 6. The analysis of tree was gave a good picture to illustrate that our strain was nearly similar to SPPV isolate El-Minufiya ORF 103 gene, partial cds, Egypt (accession number MF443334) and closely related to other strains of SPPV  isolated in India  as SPPV/Roumanian Fanar/P37  (accession no. KX398500) and SPPV/30-01/Ahmedabad/2008 (accession no. KX398519)  and SPPV isolted in USA  as SPPV 10700-99 strain TU-V02127 (accession no. AY077832, data not included in phylogentic tree)  and other isolated  in China as Sheeppox virus isolate SPPV-GL (accession no. KT438551, data not included in phylogentic tree). 

Identification-phylogentic-local-isolate-Sheeppox

Figure 6: Phylogentic tree of different Capripoxvirus depend on produced nucleotide sequence of ORF 103 gene, The tree was constructed by the use of MEGA version 6.0. * Our local isolate of Sheeppox virus.

DISCUSSION

Sheep pox is considered as one of notifiable disease as recorded by WHO with worldwide distribution as widely found in India, China, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Greece, Iran, Iraq, Bangladesh and Pakistan (Rao and bandyopadhyau, 2000; Maksyutov et al., 2013; Hani et al., 2015; Constable et al., 2017; OIE, 2017). Presence of sheep pox disease in any country limits the trade of new breeds and development of intensive sheep production. The Sheeppox virus infection is one of the common diseases among those causing economic losses occur in the form of high mortality rate in young, productivity reduction and poor wool and leather quality )Parthiban et al., 2005). Diagnosis of SPPV was based on clinical signs and postmortem findings followed by virus isolation on cell cultures with further confirmation by EM and PCR.

An outbreak of sheep pox occurred in April 2017 on a local breed of sheep in Kafr Shalshamoun, Menya Al Qamh, Sharkia, Egypt include 85 sheep (56 adults one and 29 young lambs aged 3 to 6 months old). The total percentage of diseased animals was 23.5% and the total percentage of dead animals was 8.2%. The incidence was higher than recorded by Mondal et al. (2004) reported that the incidence of infection was 18.4% during outbreak of SPPV occurred in December 2001 in Jammu, India and also higher than outbreak of SPPV that occurred in Greece 2007 with incidence of 8.45% (Mangana et al., 2008) and other detected in Sudan (18.9%) and in India (7.2%) by Nour et al. (2012) and Selvaraju (2014), respectively. But less than other reported during an outbreak of SPPV among sheep occurred in Ningxia Hui, China among sheep during November 2011, the incidence of the disease was 29.2% (Zhu et al., 2013).

In this investigation the mortality rate was 8.2% which higher than the percentage recorded by Mondal et al. (2004) in which the percentage of death was 6.3% and less than recorded by Ammar et al. (1999) detected that large number of sheep at El-Karada, Sakha and El-Gemiza in Kafr El- Sheikh Province showed skin eruptions on wool less areas of the skin with mortality rate 68.4%, diagnosis referring to SPPV infection,  Zhu et al. (2013) 14.6%, and by El-Sabagh et al. (2014) during outbreak of sheep pox disease occurred in Al-Hassa province of Saudi Arabia during the period between the winter and the spring 2013, mortality was15%. This variation in both incidence rate amd mortality rate may be attributed to difference in the study time, total number of examined animals, study localities and method of rearing.

In the current study, the observed clinical signs in suspected infected sheep were increase of body temperature, nasal discharge, lacrimation, and scabs on head, face, ears, nostrils, oral commissure, ulcer formation inside the lips, multiple cutaneous papules and nodules in inner aspect of thigh and under the tail were observed and considered as first indicator for Poxvirus infection. Similar clinical signs were observed by Daoud (1997) in Jordan, Davis and otema (1981) in Kenya, Achour et al. (2000) in Algeria, Singh et al. (2007) in India, Sharawi et al. (2011) in Egypt, Zangana and Abdullah (2013) in Iraq and Hamouda et al. (2017) in Saudi Arabia. Post-mortem findings of dead lambs revealed the presence of oedema, papules, nodules and less observed the formation of an ulcer on tongue, trachea and lung in addition to congestion on the abomasal mucosa. Equally postmortem examination of dead young lambs affected with SPPV was recorded by Diallo and viljoen (2007) and by Zhu et al. (2013) of examined 3 provinces in China during the period between 2009 to 2011 and also by Hamouda et al. (2017) during outbreak of SPPV in Saudi Arabia.

Further identification of SPPV infection by isolation was necessary to avoid miss-diagnosis and differentiate it from other similar diseases Chana et al. (2007). Skin tissue samples (papules and scabs) were selected for virus isolation as it was scientifically known that it has high survived of Poxvirus making it the best for isolation on cell culture Nawal et al. (2006); El- Sabagh et al. (2014); Amal et al. (2008) and Sharawi et al. (2011). Regarding isolation of Poxvirus on Vero cell culture revealed that appearance of cytopathic effects on 40 samples (93%). The cytopathic effects appeared as granulation of cells, cell rounding and aggregation separately without any changes in control cells.  SPPV gave clear CPE on Vero cell similar to those obtained by Rizkallah (1994); Maity et al. (1997) and Amal et al. (2008). In contrast, some strains as ranipet strain of ovine Poxvirus resist growing on Vero cells (Davis, 1976; Jassim and Keshavamurthy, 1982). In this study sheep pox was adapted on cell culture on the 3rd day post inoculation and the CPE appeared as granulation of cells followed by cell rounding and aggregated together separately within 4-5 days post inoculation. The same resut was reported by (Rizkallah, 1994; Olfat, 2000 and Amal et al., 2008). Three samples were failed to grow which may be attributed to easily contamination of culture during isolation of virus especially from field samples, may be isolated virus was previously found bind to neutralizing antibodies or cross-reacted with other viral strains as ORF as mentioned by Mangana-Vougiouka et al. (2000).

Recently, confirmation of Poxvirus infection by EM and/or PCR is more useful and prominent than conventional isolation which is more time-consuming, at least 10 days in routine cultural isolation, and needs compulsory cell culture passages. EM and PCR overcame this disadvantage as they can identify virus within 24 hr after completing the set-up procedures (Plowright and Ferris, 1958; Oguzoglu et al., 2006).

Electron microscope negative staining was used for confirmation of SPPV infection in 10 original tissue suspensions. The obtained results were mature virus particles appeared in 10 samples as brick-like shape with rounded ends. The obtained viruses characteristic brick shape was similar to those obtained by Buller and Palumbo (1991); Moss, (2001); Babiuk et al. (2009) and Bhanu Prakash et al. (2010). Negative staining of EM had the advantages of easy sample preparation, rapid analysis and the undirected that allowed rapid morphological identification of different agents (Hazelton and Gelderblom, 2003).

On the other hand, EM positive staining was used for detection of inner structure of Poxvirus from 5 scabs and tissue lesions. The obtained results were mature oval viruses particles with dumb-bell shape DNA core in all samples. The obtained results were agreed with Murray et al. (1973) and Wen et al. (2012). In conclusion, EM considered as one of a method for Poxvirus confirmation but the disadvantages facing it and limit it is used as diagnostic laboratory test, is the need for training microscopists, need for a suitable room for its operation and the inexactness in differentiating between many similar viruses (Biel and Gelderblom, 1999). PCR has been considering as perfect tool for good identifying and differentiation of Capripoxvirus strains for as the uses of E10R gene, RPO 132 gene, P32 gene, ORF 095 gene, RPO 30 gene and ORF 103 gene have expressed as powerful tools for identifying of SPPV as mentioned by (Zhou et al., 2012; Zhu et al., 2013; Hamouda et al., 2017 and Zhao et al., 2017).

ORF 103 gene was allowed to amplify of an amplicon of about 570 bp in agar gel electrophoresis. Amplification of specific DNA of SPPV was evident in all 10 samples. One of the amplified amplicon was cut, purified and sequenced. The obtained sequence was aligned by CLUSTAL W 1.81 and admitted to GeneBank under the accession number MG873537.ORF103 sequenced gene was analyzed using NCBI-BLAST then subjected to analysis by Phylogentic tree. We concluded from the analysis of NCBI result and phylogenetic tree that our isolated strain of SPPV has identity similar to other SPPV with % of identity range from 100% as El-Minufiya ORF 103 gene (MF443334) to 99% as SPPV/3174/Pune/2007 (KX398518) and also the isolated strain was closely related to GTPV and LSD with percentage vary from 99% to 97% as  (Goatpox virus isolate GTPV 143/Mukteswar/2012 virion core protein gene, complete cds)  and with LSDV as (Lumpy skin disease virus isolate SERBIA/Bujanovac/2016, complete genome). The analysis also gave a good image to illustrate that our strain was nearly similar to local strain isolated in Egypt (accession number MF443334) and closely related to other strains of SPPV isolated in India as SPPV/Roumanian Fanar/P37 (accession no. KX398500) and SPPV isolated in USA (accession no. AY077832 and other isolated in China (accession no. KT438551).  From the present result may give predication for identify and the epidemiology of Sheeppox virus in Egypt and with the possibility of isolation from different provinces inside Egypt.

Conclusion

EM and PCR have used to identify Sheeppox virus from collected tissue and scab samples. Both techniques have been considered as highly sensitive and moreover rapid and powerful to identify and differentiate Capripoxvirus. In addition to PCR method can help to give information about local strains of SPPV in our country without the need of further culture. Further study by use of ORF 103 gene is needed to confirm the presence of the same strain in different localities in Egypt and to confirm the degree of homology with the already used Romanian strain of SPPV as vaccine for near future the possibility of use the local strain as a vaccine.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the staff of animal medicine department, farmers who participated in this work and technicians for their excellent laboratory assistance and data collections. This work was performed using the facilities of Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University and Department of Virology, Animal Health Research Institute, Dokki, Giza.

About the Authors

Corresponding Author

Elshaima M. Fawzi

Department of Animal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, 44511, Egypt

Email:
[email protected]

References

  • Achour HA, Bonguedour R, Bouhbal A, Guechtouli A (2000) Comparative study of immunizing ability of some attenuated strains of Sheeppox virus and sensitizing vaccine. Rev. Sci Tech. 19 (3): 773-783.
  • Amal MAR, Shahein MA, Abd El-Monem H (2008) Electrophoretic characterization of Sheeppox virus, Goatpox virus and Lumpy skin disease virus. Egypt. J Comp Path and Clinic Path.  21 (1): 15- 30.
  • Ammar KM, Al-Gaabary MH, Abou- Rawash AA, Foad FM (1999) Clinical, epidemiological and histopathological studies on sheep pox in some farms in Egypt. 5th Sci. Cong., Egyptian Society for Cattle Disease: 60-62. https://doi.org/10.3329/ijns.v1i4.9734  
  • Babiuk S, Bowden TR, Boyle DB, Wallace DB, et al. (2009) Capripoxviruses: an emerging worldwide threat to sheep, goats and cattle. Tran. bound. Emerg. An outbreak of sheep pox associated Dis. 55:263-272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1865-1682.2008.01043.x 
  • Bhanuprakash V, Venkatesan G, Balamurugan V, Hosamani M (2010) Pox outbreaks in sheep and goats at Makhdoom (Uttar Pradesh), India: evidence of Sheeppox virus infection in goats. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 57: 375-382. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1865-1682.2010.01158.x  
  • Biel SS, Gelderblom HR (1999) Diagnostic electron microscopy is still a timely and rewarding method. J. Clin. Virol. 13:105-119.https://doi.org/10.1016/s1386-6532(99)00027-x     
  • Buller RML, Palumbo GJ (1991) Poxvirus pathogenesis. Microbiology Review 55 (1): 80-122.
  • Chana KW, Lin JW, Lee SH, Liao CJ, et al. (2007) Identification and phylogenic analysis of ORF virus from goats in Taiwan. Virus Genes 35:705-712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11262-006-0068-6 
  • Constable P, Hinchcliff WK, Done S, Gruenberg W (2017) Veterinary medicine (11th edn) A textbook of the diseases of cattle, horses, sheep, pigs, and goats.  
  • Curry A, Appleton H, Dowsett B (2006) Application of transmission electron microscopy to the clinical study of viral and bacterial infections: present and future. Micron. 37 (2): 91-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2005.10.001
  • Daoud JA (1997) Sheep in Jordan. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 29 (4): 251-252.
  • Davies FG (1976) Characterization of virus causing a pox disease in sheep and goats in Kenya, with observations on the epidemiology and control. J Hyg. 79 (2): 163:171. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022172400055066
  • Davies FG, Otema C (1981) Relationships of Capripoxviruses found in Kenya with two Middle Eastern strains and some Orthopoxviruses. Res. in Vet. Sci. 31 (2): 253-255.
  • Diallo A, Viljoen GJ (2007) Genus Capripoxvirus. In: Poxviruses. (Mercer AA, A Schmidt, O Weber, Eds). Birkhauser Basel Switzerland 167-181.
  • El-Sabagh I, Al-Shabebi A, Abu-Elzein E, Zaghawa A, et al. (2014) Molecular detection and phylogenetic analysis of Sheeppox virus in Al – Hassa of Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. Advances in Animal and Vet. Sci. 2 (25): 31-34. https://doi.org/10.14737/journal.aavs/2014/2.2s.31.34
  • Fenner E, Paul JG, Frederick A, Michael JS, et al. (1996) Veterinary Virology. (2nd edn). Academic Press. Inc.
  • Hamouda M, Al-Hizab F, El-Sabagh I (2017) Clinical, pathological, and molecular diagnosis of Sheeppox virus in Saudi Arabia. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences. 27(1): 91-97.
  • Hani B, Thang T, Shawn B, Maged G (2015) Seroprevalence of Sheeppox and Goatpox, Peste des petits ruminants and Rift valley fever in Saudi Arabia. PLoS One 10 (10): e0140328. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140328
  • Hazelton PR, Gelderblom HR (2003) Electron microscopy for rapid diagnosis of infectious agents in emergent situation. Emerging Infectious diseases. 9(3): 1-16.
  • Jassim FA, Keshavamurthy BS (1982) Propagation of Sheeppox virus in cell cultures. Acta. Virol. 26 (3): 190–192.
  • Kay HD (1965) Techniques for electron microscopy. Black well scientific publications, Oxford, UK. p: 60. 
  • Kitching RP, Carn VM (2004) Sheeppox and Goatpox. Office International des Epizooties Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals (mammals, birds, and bees). OIE, Paris.
  • Kitching RP, Taylor WP (1985) Clinical and antigenic relationship between isolates of Sheeppox and Goatpox viruses. Tropical Animal Health and Production 17 (2): 64-79.
  • Maity S, Chatterjee A, Mitra K, Chakraborty J, et al. (1997) Studies on adaptation of Goatpox virus (uttarkashi strain) in Vero cell. Indian veterinary Journal, 74 (8): 700-702.
  • Maksyutov RA, Gavrilova EV, Agafonov AP, Taranov OS, et al. (2013) An outbreak of Sheeppox in Zabajkalskij kray of Russia. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 62(4): 453-456. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.12176
  • Mangana O, Kottaridi C, Nomikou K (2008) The epidemiology of Sheeppox in Greece from 1987 to 2007. Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz. 27 (3): 899-905. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.27.3.1845
  • Mangana-Vougiouka O, Markoulatos P, Koptopoulos G, Nomikou K, et al. (2000) Sheeppox virus identification from clinical specimens by PCR, cell culture, immunofluorescence and agargelimmuno precipitation assay. Mol. Cell. Probes 14 (5): 305-310. https://doi.org/10.1006/mcpr.2000.0319
  • Matthews RE (1982) Classification and nomenclature of viruses. Intervirology 17: 1–99.
  • Mondal B, Hosamani M, Dutta TK, Senthilkumar VS, et al. (2004) An outbreak of sheep pox on a sheep breeding farm in Jammu, India. Rev. Sci. tech. Off. Int. Epiz. 23 (3): 943-949. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.23.3.1536
  • Moss B (2001) Poxviridae: the viruses and their replication. In Fields virology (4th edn). Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 2849-2883.
  • Murphy FA, Faquet CM, Bishop DHL, Ghabrial SA, et al. (1995) Virus taxonomy. 6th report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Arch. Virol. Suppl. 10: 85-86.
  • Murray M, Martin WB, Köylü A (1973) Experimental sheep pox. A histological ultra structural study. Res Vet Sci 201-208.  
  • Nawal MA, Youssef A, Omayma A, Nahed S, et al. (2006) Western blotting, electrophoresis transfer of proteins from sodium dodecyl sulfate – poly acrylamide gels to unmodified nitrocellulose and radio iodinated protein A. Analytic Biochemistry (United State: Academic press) 112 (2):195-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(81)90281-5
  • Nour TAM, Fadol MA, Ahmed AM, Yagoub IA, et al. (2012) Studies on the humoral immune response of sheep to Sheep Pox Thermostable Vaccine. The Sudan. J Vet Res. 26(1): 7-12.
  • Oguzoglu TC, Alkan F, Ozkul A, Atalay-Vural S, et al. (2006) A Sheeppox virus outbreak in Central Turkey in 2003: Isolation and Identification of Capripoxvirus. Veterinary Research Communications 30 (8): 965-971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-006-3259-7
  • Ohi M, Li Y, Cheng Y, Walz T(2004) Negative staining and image classification – powerful tools in modern electron microscopy. Biological Procedures Online 6 (1): 23-34. https://doi.org/10.1251/bpo70
  • OIE (2017) Internationale des Epizooties (World Health Organization for Animals) Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals. Sheep Pox and Goat Pox. 7: 13: 1-12.
  • Olfat EN (2000) Studies on sheep pox vaccine, Ph.D. Thesis Virology, Faculty of Vet. Med. Cairo University.
  • Parthiban MR, Govindarajan S, Manoharan V, Purushothaman NDJ, et al. (2005) Comparative sequence analysis of diagnostic PCR amplicons from Indian Sheeppox virus. Vet. Arhiv. 75: 203-209.
  • Plowright W, Ferris PD (1958) The growth and cytopathogenicity of Sheeppox virus in tissue culture. British Journal of Experimental Pathology. 39: 424–435.
  • Rao TVS, Bandyopadhyay SK (2000) A comprehensive review of goat pox and sheep pox and their diagnosis. Animal Health Research Reviews. 1(2): 127-136. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1466252300000116
  • Rizkallah SS (1994) Further studies on sheep pox disease in Egypt. Ph. D Thesis (infectious and fish disease). Faculty of Vet. Med. Cairo University.
  • Sambrook J, Fritscgh EF, Mentiates T (1989) Molecular cloning. A laboratory manual. Cold spring Harbour Laboratory press, New York.
  • Selvaraju G (2014) Epidemiological measures of disease frequency against Sheep pox. Inter. J. of scienti. Res. 3(8): 2277-8179. https://doi.org/10.15373/22778179/august2014/145  
  • Sharawi SSA, Al-hofufy AN, Al-habib MA (2011) Comparison of isolation, conventional and developed indoor new syprgreen real-time PCR assay for diagnosis of Sheeppox / Goatspox and Contagious ecthyma viruses. Alex J Vet Sci. 33 (1):73-85.
  • Sheikh–Ali MA, Hamad ME, Ali BH, Saeed AW (2004) Alterations in some epidemiological patterns and virus heterogeneity recently observed in sheep pox outbreaks in the Sudan. Vet Arhiv. 74: 341-350.
  • Singh RD, Chandra KP, Singh M, Hosamani RK, et al. (2007) Epidemiological investigation of sheep pox outbreaks in Rajasthan, India. Indian Journal of Veterinary Pathology. 31: 712-715.
  • USDA. Agricultural bioterrorism act of (2002). Fedl Regist. 67(155): 52383–52389.
  • Wen M, Cheng Z, Zhang DX, Yang JL, et al. (2012) A study on the ultra structural of Goat pox in Guizhou, China. J. of Animal and Vet. Advances 11(16): 2934-2935. https://doi.org/10.3923/javaa.2012.2934.2935
  • Yadav S, Hosamani M, Balamurugan V, Bhanuprakash V, et al. (2010) Partial genetic characterization of viruses isolated from pox-like infection in cattle and buffaloes: evidence of buffalo pox virus circulation in Indian cows. Arch. Virol. 155: 255-261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-009-0562-y
  • Zangana IK, Abdullah MA (2013) Epidemiological, clinical, and histopathological studies on lamb and kid pox in Duhok, Iraq. Bulgarian J Vet Med. 16(2): 133-138.
  • Zhao Z, Wu G, Yan X, Zhu X, et al. (2017) Development of duplex PCR for differential detection of Goatpox and Sheeppox viruses. BMC Veterinary Research. 13 (278): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1179-0
  • Zhou T, Jia H, Chen G, He X, et al. (2012) Phylogenetic analysis of Chinese Sheeppox and Goatpox virus isolates. Virology Journal. 9 (25): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422x-9-25
  • Zhu XL, Yang F, Li HX, Dou YX, et al. (2013) Identification and phylogenetic analysis of a Sheeppox virus isolated from the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region of China. Genetics and Molecular Research 12 (2):1670-1678. https://doi.org/10.4238/2013.may.14.7

Keywords:
Download:
Full PDF